Armstrong Super-Heterodyne

Early Super front view
Early Super inside view

     A few years ago a gentleman from Texas (Mike) sent me some photos of a bunch of old superhets that he had recently acquired. There were many desirable sets among the lot, including a few Leutz’s, a few Scott’s, a Pressley, a Receptrad, a St. James, and a Lincoln. One photo showed a miscellaneous lot of some thirteen or fourteen sets stacked five or six high. Of particular interest to me was a very early set that he said was made by a Signal Corps veteran of World War 1. Everything about this set had a primitive look to it, as far as tube radios go, including the early 3-inch tuning dials, the porcelain RCA tube sockets, the RCA audio transformer, the tinfoil shielded compartments, and the wiring. Most of all, it looked like the IF amplifier was resistance coupled!
     The first resistance coupled superheterodynes were known as “Armstrong Short Wave Amplifiers,” or “Armstrong Super-Autodyne Amplifiers,” or simply “Armstrong Amplifiers.” The term “Super-Heterodyne” had not been coined yet. I did some initial research on the set and figured that it may be a version of a resistance coupled superhet described by Paul Godley in the February, 1923, Radio Broadcast magazine. I wanted the set but Mike wasn’t ready to get rid of it. He had a 1922 Leutz “Armstrong Super-Heterodyne” panel and he thought that some of the parts from this set would help complete the Leutz. I didn’t like the idea of this historical piece getting parted out.

     In February, 2015, I got an unexpected e-mail from Mike inquiring if I was still interested in the old “home-brew.” “Are you kidding?” Yes, I was definitely still interested in it, and a deal was soon made. It took a few weeks to get it in the mail. It was well packed and double boxed, and it actually took over an hour to remove the outer layers of the packaging. What was left was the radio heavily wrapped in plastic wrap lying on the floor of my radio room. It was late and I was exhausted, so I decided to “savor the moment,” and open it up the rest of the way in the morning. I had waited over a year to get my hands on this radio and a few more hours wouldn’t hurt.
     I woke up early in the morning and quickly got the radio out of the plastic wrap, then it took another twenty minutes to remove the packing inside the radio! I examined the guts for a few moments and I was somewhat mystified. To tell the truth, I was starting to wonder if the set was actually a superhet. The items I thought were resistors in grid-leak type mountings were actually transformers! I was beginning to worry that the set was some type of exotic non-superhet long wave RF amplifier. It was not the Holy Grail that I thought it was. However, a quick tracing of the circuit put my mind at ease a little bit; it was definitely a superheterodyne!

Early Super-Heterodyne schematic 1

     Hand-drawn schematic diagram of the early superheterodyne. It’s got a few design features that I’ve never seen before. The entire oscillator section is unusual, but mostly in the way the energy is coupled into the 1st detector. The tuned circuit for the 1st detector plate resistance is very unusual and the 1st detector is resistance coupled to the first IF stage. I believe the switch is used to couple the output of the 1st detector directly into the audio amplifier. The IF transformers are unusual. Note that the grid bias of the first three IF stages is de-coupled with a choke and bypass capacitor and is connected directly to C-. This set does not have the usual stability control for the IF amplifier. Perhaps the only way to control the IF gain is to adjust the filament voltage. The LC filter on the audio output is unusual. I think most of the set is deigned very well. Feedback and oscillations are controlled with the separate shielded compartments and good de-coupling of the various power supply feeds.

     Here are a few specifics about the set:

    1. The radio works on the standard 1920s superhet scheme.
    2. The front panel measures 35” long by 7.5” high by .25” thick (not a standard size by mid 20s standards).
    3. IF transformers and chokes are not yet identified.
    4. RCA UV-712 audio transformer, RCA UR-542 porcelain tube sockets, RCA PR-535 rheostats, and RCA UX-543 resistor and capacitor holders. The tube sockets have a December 23, 1919, patent date on the metal sleeve.
    5. Early style oscillator tuning capacitor with early 20s style 3” dial.
    6. Original SLC loop tuning capacitor has been replaced with a SLW or SLF tuning capacitor. The rotor plates were too long to fit in the original compartment so part of the compartment was removed to make the clearance.
    7. The oscillator coils and the coupling coils are probably home made. Professional job making the coils though, with the coupling coils being bank-wound.
    8. Eight tubes.

Early Super IF amplifier close up

     Close-up view of the IF amplifier. The transformers are identified on the baseboard with a “no I” for the first transformer, a “no II” for the second transformer, and a “no III” for the third transformer. Not visible in the photos, but the tuning capacitor for each transformer has a paper label on the underside that identifies it the same way as the transformer. Many of the parts throughout the set are identified with pen or pencil on the baseboard.

Early Super no.1 IF transformer

     Close-up view of the “no I” IF transformer and associated tuning capacitor. I thought that the transformers were resistors when I fist saw photos of the set. The secondary coil is divided into five different sections and it is sandwiched between two different primary coils (each primary coil is connected in series and they are located on each end of the assembly). I believe the sectional construction was to reduce the distributed capacitance of the coils. The wire is very fine and the coil assembly is attracted to a magnet (indicating that it has some type of an iron core). The transformer would have a relatively small external magnetic field and it would be a good choice for a multistage amplifier.

Early Super 1st detector plate circuit Early Super oscillator choke

     Above left: close-up photo of the 1st detector plate tuned circuit. This coil, or choke, is similar to the IF transformers, but there is only one coil. Like the IF transformers, it is shunted with a .00025 mFd capacitor.
     Above right: Oscillator plate choke coil. This coil looks identical to the 1st detector plate coil

Early Super oscillator coil and capacitor Early Super oscillator coupler

     Above left: Close-up view of the oscillator coil and associated components. The grid bias resistor is the large black cylinder in the upper left corner.
     Above right: Close-up view of the oscillator coupler. The coils were designed to slide along the wood dowel and thereby change the amount of energy coupled into the 1st detector.

Early Super tuning capacitors

     Photo showing the labels on the 1st detector plate tuning capacitor and the IF transformer tuning capacitors. The capacitors are all .00025 mFd and they all measured very close to the rated value. Capacitor number 1 (no I) is marked with a frequency of 81 KC. I don’t exactly know what the other numbers mean but it was obviously an attempt to match the frequency on the different transformers. The builder of this set had access to some type of measuring equipment. The 1st detector plate coil had a similar label attached to it but the label was loose in the bottom of the set when I got the radio.

Early Super 2nd detector and audio amp close up

     Photo showing the 2nd detector and audio amplifier. The 2nd detector grid leak bias is in the upper left corner, the audio output filter is in the upper right corner.

Early Super audio plate resistors Early Super audio filter

     Above left: Close-up photo of the first audio plate resistors. Each resistor is 55k ohms, giving a total load resistance of 110k ohms. I am not familiar with this type of resistor. The oscillator bias resistor is the same type of construction.
     Above right: Close-up photo of the audio output filter. The choke has a similar construction as the other coils but it is made with a little bit bigger wire. One of the filter capacitors is missing (it may have been removed on purpose). This coil looks identical to the choke coil in the grid bias filter/bypass circuit for the IF amp.

scanned paper from early super

     This is a scan of an old piece of paper that was found lying in the bottom of the radio. Some of the parameters on the left column include the 2nd audio, 1st audio, 1st RF, 2nd RF, 3rd RF, 1st detector, 2nd detector, and oscillator. Other parameters may indicate different experiments. Most of the data looks like plate current measurements at 45 volts and 90 volts. In the upper right corner it looks like the words Reflected & Forward. This paper shows evidence of extensive experimenting with the radio. I like this type of documentation on a radio; I just wish the author would have put his name and date on it!

     Below is a table showing the bandpass properties of the different stages in the IF amplifier. The grid bias on the first three stages was referenced to A-. The grid bias on the last stage was referenced to A+ and the grid leak components were in the circuit.


Peak Freq.

Lower 3 dB

Upper 3 dB


Relative gain

Pri. ohms

Sec. ohms

1st d.p.

80.0 KC

62.1 KC

103.5 KC

41.4 KC




no I

77.4 KC*

75.1 KC

83.1 KC

8.0 KC




no II

75.5 KC

72.1 KC

79.1 KC

7.0 KC




no III

76.6 KC

74.2 KC

79.2 KC

5.0 KC




* this transformer actually had two peaks, the largest peak at 77.4 KC, and a smaller peak at 81.0 KC. This was the only transformer that showed two peaks.

RCA ad PRN August 1921

     Radio Corporation of America advertisement from the August, 1921, Pacific Radio News magazine. This one advertisement has three of the major components used in my early superheterodyne! The tube socket shown in this ad is probably of a newer design than the tube sockets in my radio. The UV-712 transformer was advertised as being introduced in July, 1921, so my early superhet must have been made sometime after July, 1921.

     I searched through many early magazines trying to find information on the IF transformers used in this superhet. Another goal of the research was to look for similarities in circuit design and try to pinpoint a date of manufacture. The following is a chronological list of the different articles found, and information specific to this set. The various magazines can be found online for viewing and download at

     Edwin H. Armstrong gave a talk about the superheterodyne at Columbia University on December 19, 1919. For many people this was probably the first news that they had ever heard about the new system for short-wave reception. Within two months of this talk there were three different articles published in national magazines describing the superheterodyne, and giving enough details for experimenters and amateurs to make one!

(1) 1920, Feb., QST, A New Method for the Reception of Weak Signals at Short Wave Lengths, by Edwin H. Armstrong, E. E.
Resistance coupled
     This article was a copy of Armstrong’s talk at Columbia University in Dec. 1919. Though most of the article describes resistance coupled RF stages, Armstrong makes it clear that the method works with any form of coupling. Armstrong talks about the great difficulties encountered during the war by Round in England and Latour in France to produce a high frequency amplifier to cover a frequency range of 300 to 800 meters. Part of the solution was the design of transformers with very fine wire to reduce the capacitance and increase the resistance, both of which would help prevent oscillations. These transformers also had iron cores. The purpose of the iron was to increase the inductance to capacitance ratio and introduce resistance into the system, both of which help flatten out the response. This describes the transformers in my set to a “T”! I believe the transformers in my set were originally designed to operate well in a wide band RF amplifier. The .00025 mFd capacitor shunted across the secondary had the effect of lowing the frequency and narrowing the response.

Armstrong Fig. A QST February 1920
Armstrong Fig. B QST February 1920

     The above two diagrams were included in Armstrong’s article in the Feb., 1920, QST, as an addendum from the Hartley Research Laboratory at Columbia University (Armstrong’s laboratory). This diagram is typical of most resistance coupled superhets. The tuned input coupler, C4 & L4, and C5 & L5, provided selectivity for the IF amplifier, as the resistance coupled amplifier itself is fairly wide banded. I believe the variable capacitor C3 in Figure B was used as a stability control. Of particular interest to my set is the RC filter on the audio output. The filter is similar to the filter used in my set, and it was used keep the radio frequency currents out of the telephone cords and prevent their reaction on the input of the amplifier and thus prevent oscillations.

(2) 1920, Feb., The Wireless Age, High Amplification at Short Wave Length, by Paul F. Godley
Resistance coupled
     This article gave a schematic diagram and parts values for a 9-tube resistance coupled superhet. The schematic showed an RC filter between the 2nd detector and the first audio amplifier tube, similar to the filter shown above in Figure B. Godley goes into a rather lengthy discussion on how to make the plate and grid resistors in the IF amplifier, 100,000 ohms and 2,000,000 ohms, respectively. The resistors in the oscillator bias circuit and the audio plate circuit of my set look like they may have been made by using Godley’s description, though I think the resistors in my set were commercially made.

(3) 1920, Feb., Radio News, The Armstrong Super-Autodyne Amplifier, Part 1, by H. W. Houck
Resistance coupled
     This article describes the operation and construction of a 7-tube resistance coupled superhet. There is not very much new information in this article or anything I noticed that was directly related to my early superhet.

(4) 1920, March, Radio News, The Armstrong Super-Autodyne Amplifier, part 2, by H. W. Houck
Transformer coupled
     This article described a 6-tube transformer coupled superhet using home made RF transformers.

Houck RN March 1920

     Schematic diagram from the Houck article in the March, 1920, Radio News magazine. This circuit is somewhat similar to my early superhet in that the secondary of each RF transformer is shunted with a capacitor (most of fixed value). I believe the variable capacitor C2 in the IF amplifier is used as a stability control; de-tune to the point where the amplifier stops oscillating.

(5) 1921, Aug., QST, Reception of 200-meter Signals by Means of a Loop and an Armstrong Super-Heterodyne, by Leroy M. E. Clausing
Transformer coupled
     This is a copy of a paper that was read before the Third District Amateur Radio Convention at Philadelphia on Feb. 26, 1921. This article describes the frequency changing portion of a superhet and the purpose of the input coupler but it does not go into any detail on the actual transformer coupled IF amplifier, only that “Detailed instructions for constructing radio frequency amplifiers have appeared from time to time in the various radio magazines.” Clausing also states this: “The amplifier used by the writer was of the type that employed tuned coupling coils between the successive radio frequency stages. This type will give higher amplification than the resistance coupled type for a given number of stages and it is therefore the most desirable type for amateur use.”

     It is interesting to note that this article is one of the first published since the first four articles were published in February/March of 1920. That is nearly one and a half years.

(6) 1921, Dec., Radio, The Armstrong Super-Heterodyne, by A. K. Aster
Resistance coupled
     This article describes a 5-tube resistance coupled superhet. Aster notes: “It will be noted that only the first step of the radio frequency amplifier is tuned, the other steps being resistance coupled. This is far simpler than the ordinary radio frequency amplifier because, once set, it does not need any further adjusting.” This is exactly why most of the earliest superheterodynes were resistance coupled; they were easier to adjust and get working correctly.
     Aster also notes this: “The oscillator, tuner, radio-frequency amplifier and detector, and audio-frequency amplifier must be mounted in separately shielded boxes or in separately shielded compartments of a single box. I cannot overemphasize the fact that the system must be properly shielded to get satisfactory results.” Also: “All joints of the box, except the top, should be soldered and the connecting wires from one compartment to another should be led through as small a hole as practical.” This type of construction is very similar to my early super!

(7) 1922, Jan., Radio News, -and now 200 meter Radio Frequency Amplification
Transformer coupled
     This is an advertisement from the Radio Corporation of America describing the UV-1714 and UV-1716 radio frequency amplifying transformers. These were some of the first radio frequency transformers on the market and they would soon have a dramatic effect on superheterodyne construction. Here is a cover scan of an April 15, 1922 brochure on the UV-1714 and UV-1716 transformers.

(8) 1922, Feb., QST, Official Report on the Second Transatlantic Tests, by Paul F. Godley
Resistance coupled
     This was an article by Paul Godley reporting his transatlantic short wave radio communication from Ardrossan, Scotland. Many people did not think it possible for amateurs to communicate by radio signals from across the Atlantic Ocean on short wave lengths. These tests proved, without a doubt, that it was not only possible to to communicate, but that this form of communication would likely be very commonplace in the future. The main radio used? A 9-tube resistance coupled superhet! These successful tests had a great effect on the popularity of the superheterodyne.

(9) 1922, Feb., Radio, Construction of a Radio Frequency Amplifier from Standard Parts, by G. M. Best
Resistance coupled
     This article is kind of a continuation of the Aster article in the Dec., 1921, Radio magazine. The main difference here was that the radio used standard honeycomb coils for the oscillator and the input coupler. This was only a 4-tube set. I have the feeling that Aster and Best were just getting their feet wet with superhets and they wanted to avoid the troubles with multistage amplifiers and many tubes.

(10) 1922, July, Wireless Age, Models built from Experimenters Information Service Blue Prints
Resistance coupled
     This is an advertisement from the Experimenters Information Services showing their “Armstrong Super-Heterodyne,” blue prints number 30035-38. I have not seen the schematic for this set but I understand that it was resistance coupled. Another paper I have seen on this set describes it as the “Improved Armstrong Super-Heterodyne Receiver,” and indicates that it was introduced in about March/April 1922 (blue prints 30035, 36, 37, 38, 38A).
     Another item advertised on this page was an RF amplifier using RCA UV-1714/UV-1716 type transformers (blue prints 30050-52). It makes me wonder if there was a modular E.I.S. superhet design using this amplifier.

(11) 1922, Oct. 7, Radio World, Superheterodyne Receiver as Applied to the Armstrong Superregenerative Circuit, by Charles R. Leutz
Resistance coupled
     This article has a description of the E.I.S. “New Armstrong Super Heterodyne Receiver.” It looks like the blue prints in the article are number 30066, dated September, 1922. Another source I have seen on this set lists blue print 30067-75. This set is known among collectors as the resistance coupled Model L Super Heterodyne. The schematic diagram shows a 10-tube set but the photos in the article show an 8-tube set. This set uses two of the RCA UV-712 audio transformers.

(12) 1922, Dec., Wireless Age, A Practical Super-Heterodyne Receiver, by 2ZL Station (also 2XAQ), editor
Transformer coupled
     This article describes an 8-tube superhet using the RCA UV-1714 RF transformers. Any design that promoted the resistance coupled method after this article came out was obsolete before it was printed! This article marked a turning point in superhet design, made possible by the commercial, ready-made, and off-the-shelf RCA transformers.

(13) 1923, Feb., Radio Broadcast, A Super-Sensitive Long Range Receiver, by Paul F. Godley
Resistance coupled
     This article shows a schematic diagram of an 8-tube resistance coupled superhet using one audio transformer. There are also photos of the superhet that Godley used in Ardrossan, Scotland, some fifteen months prior. Godley gives the general description of superheterodyne action but the hardware is very outdated at this time.

(14) 1923, June, Popular Radio, Question: Please show me a hook-up of an Armstrong super-heterodyne receiver
Resistance coupled
     This was a question to the magazine editors, answered by a schematic of an 8-tube resistance coupled superheterodyne using two audio transformers, including component values. The schematic was titled “The famous Armstrong super-heterodyne receiver.” Again, very outdated at this time.

(15) 1923, July, Radio News, Super-Heterodyne Receiver, by R. R. Mayo
Transformer coupled
     This small article describes a 10-tube superhet using the RCA UV-1714 transformers (iron core operating at 5000 meters, or 60 KC). Photos of the set show a 10-tube radio but the schematic only has seven tubes.

(16) 1923, July, Radio News, For Long Distance Concerts Super Heterodyne; New Advanced Model “C”
Transformer coupled
     This is an advertisement for the E.I.S. Model C superheterodyne.  The Model C superhet used the RCA UV-1716 transformers operating at 30 KC. I have to assume that the Model C came out before the transformer coupled Model L (I have in hand transformer coupled Model L blue prints 30067-8, 30069-70, 30071-72, and 30073, all dated Aug. 1923.

     The year 1923 ended up with several more superhet articles, including the Roberts from the Aug. Radio Broadcast (UV-1716 transformers), the Haynes-Griffin from the Sept., Oct., Nov., and Dec. Popular Radio (Haynes-Griffin air-core transformers), the Eltz from the Nov. Radio Broadcast (UV-1716 transformers), the Pearne from the Nov. Radio Age (probably UV-1716 transformers), and the de Willy & LaCault from the Dec. Radio News (UV-1716 transformers).
     The main point is, the resistance coupled superhet from the early 1920s was a thing of the past.

     So, where does my early superheterodyne fit in the scheme of things? My set was made almost exclusively with RCA parts, and if the RCA UV-1714 and UV-1716 transformers were available then I’m sure the builder would have used them. My set must predate the RCA transformers, or at least predate the time that those transformers were easily procured.
     Another question is, who was the manufacturer of the RF (IF) transformers in my set? Those transformers were surely commercially made by someone. In my research I came across one RF transformer that predated the RCA transformers. This transformer was the Radio Instrument Company Type DX, the “first RF transformer on the market.”

Radio Instrument ad RN Dec 1921

     Advertisement for the Radio Instrument Company Type DX radio frequency transformer, as copied from the December, 1921, Radio News magazine. “It uses an iron core. The unique design (patent pending) eliminates capacity effects. Close electromagnetic coupling.” The transformers in my set could easily be described that way. My transformers could easily fit inside the rectangular box of the DX type transformer.
     I think there is a good possibility that the transformers in my early superhet were made by the Radio Instrument Company, before they started encapsulating their transformers in a rectangular box. I have a set of Radio Instrument Company DX-2H transformers, and an x-ray image of one of my transformers may prove the point one way or the other.
     In any event, my early superhet was probably made in late 1921, or possibly early 1922. It’s the closest thing I have to what contemporaries would call an “Armstrong Super-Heterodyne.”

Major Edwin H. Armstrong

Major Edwin H. Armstrong, circa 1918

This page was added to this site on April 10, 2015

January 31, 2017 update:

     Mike from Texas sent me an e-mail and informed me that Les Miller (from San Antonio) was the guy that made this radio. It is great to know the name of the guy that made the radio and it gives a new direction for research.

     Speaking of research, I’ve just about decided that the intermediate frequency transformers in this radio are not the Radio Instrument Company types after all. The Radio Instrument Company “DX” type transformers are wound similar to the transformers in this radio (six machined slots for the primary and six machined slots for the secondary), but instead of having the secondary sandwiched between the primary, as the IF transformers in my radio, the “DX” type transformer has the primary and secondary at opposite ends of the former. The “DX” type transformer uses very fine wire for the coils, but the transformer is square and much larger than the transformers in this radio. I believe the IF transformers in this radio predate the Radio Instrument Company transformer (as advertised in the December, 1921 Radio News magazine). Click HERE for more information on the construction of the Radio Instrument Company transformer.

     Percival Lowell invented the the type of transformer construction as used by the Radio Instrument Company, but he did not originate the idea of an iron core radio frequency transformer. Captain H. J. Round in England was working with air core transformers wound with very fine wire in about 1916, and about the same time Marius Latour in France was working with iron core transformers wound with very fine wire. The objective of their research was to develop a wide band radio frequency amplifier that did not need tuning adjustments for the various stages of the amplifier. To reach this objective it was desirous to increase the inductance and the resistance of the coils, but reduce the capacitance. This was all pioneering work and a multitude of tradeoffs needed to be found. The use of very fine wire increased the inductance and resistance for a given size of coil. Special coil winding techniques and a small size coil would reduce the capacitance. A special iron core made of very thin laminations of silicon steel would increase the inductance to capacitance ratio, with the added benefit of increasing the resistance. Most of these parameters all had an effect on each other.

     As of this date I have been unable to find a photograph of the transformers as used by Captain H. J. Round and Marius Latour during World War 1. However, I have found photos of a vacuum tube devised by Round for use in a multistage radio frequency amplifier in about 1916. The tube is the V24. This tube is small (to reduce capacitance) and it has a mounting system very similar to the IF transformers in my early superhet. Being a Signal Corps veteran of World War 1, I suspect that Les Miller was familiar with the type of experimental transformers that were used during the War and he used them in his superheterodyne.

V24 valve ww1-air

     The V24 valve, or vacuum tube. The very small size reduced the capacitance. The mounting for this tube is very similar to the transformers in my early superhet.

Wilson<     HOME     >ACME IF transformers